[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Use of the term "notarised signature"?

To: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Use of the term "notarised signature"?
From: Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 18:55:43 -0700
Delivery-date: Fri, 30 May 2003 03:56:17 +0200
Envelope-to: ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3ED698AD.8B684152@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418

On 5/29/03 4:33 PM, "Ian Grigg" <iang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  0x50: 3rd party confirmatory signature.

I used "Third-Party Confirmation Signature."

    Jon

References:
- Re: Use of the term "notarised signature"?
  - From: Ian Grigg

Prev by Date: Re: Suggested DER Prefixes
Next by Date: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes)
Previous by thread: Re: Use of the term "notarised signature"?
Next by thread: Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread