[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tag 11 unclear

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:51:33PM -0700, "Hal Finney" wrote:
> David Shaw writes:
> > What about (onepass, literal, literal, literal, sig) ?  Treat as the
> > multiple literal bodies concatenated together?
> I don't think we should allow this.  There are too many potentials
> for mischief due to the absence of boundary information feeding into
> the signature.

Note that this is currently legal syntax in the grammar.

(I actually suggested the run-of-literal-packets grammar change to
resolve a problem elsewhere in the document, but that doesn't mean I
was right).