[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [openpgp] details of 4880bis work
> On Apr 16, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Vincent Breitmoser <email@example.com> wrote:
> My use of the term was misleading I must admit, going by 4880. I just
> always found it confusing that a "public key" in OpenPGP lingo means "a
> collection of one primary key and some subkeys", where each of those is
> a 'public key' in itself in a cryptographical sense.
And that's why sometimes you should just use the word "Certificate."
openpgp mailing list