[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [suse-security] SuSE Security Announcement: sendmail (SuSE-SA:2003:023)



> >
> >                         SuSE Security Announcement
> >
> >         Package:                sendmail, sendmail-tls
> >         Announcement-ID:        SuSE-SA:2003:023
>
> When I patched and recompiled sendmail-8.11.3-106 (for SuSE 7.2)
> yesterday, I noticed that my sendmail binary was 50% smaller than the
> version supplied by SuSE (this applies to the current update, too);
> I *think* libssl and libcrypt are linked statically in the SuSE version -
> is this true?  And if it is - why?

It's not these two, it's /usr/lib/libldap.a and /usr/lib/liblber.a that
are linked statically. The newer distributions are linked dynamically
agaist these libraries, the older ones have tradeoffs. The reason for the
static linking is based on dependencies between packages. Building the
packages can have circular dependencies, which makes it a bit difficult at
times...

> Martin

Roman.
-- 
 -                                                                      -
| Roman Drahtmüller      <draht@xxxxxxx> // "You don't need eyes to see, |
  SuSE Linux AG - Security       Phone: //             you need vision!"
| Nürnberg, Germany     +49-911-740530 //           Maxi Jazz, Faithless |
 -                                                                      -

--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@xxxxxxxx
Security-related bug reports go to security@xxxxxxx, not here