[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: [suse-security] ID wwywxugwisi... thanks


I agree too. Where, when not in security lists could this done for testing?


- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: john@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 18:50
An: suse-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [suse-security] ID wwywxugwisi... thanks

  I agree that it's a dumb idea, but these virii don't know and don't care
what the purpose of this list is. Someday some nitwit will stumble onto a
piece of code that exploits an as-yet undiscovered flaw in one or more
linux email clients, and we'll have a small disaster. It's just plain
naive to think this will never happen. Perhaps later than sooner, but
there is a lot more likelyhood that it will than it won't.

Since it does no good to complain without offering a solution, here's an

  Why not require all messages posted to this list to be signed with the
users's gpg key? Building functionality into the list daemon to verify
signatures would be easy task and would also help cut back on the spam
that invades this list from time to time. Users can supply their public
key at subscription time or it can be pulled from a keyserver when the
users posts. It's really not a huge inconvenience...

  I'm signing this post to show how easy it is.

Just my modest input...


Version: CryptoEx OpenPGP Engine Version 2.1
Comment: KEBA CryptoEx Business Server - http://www.cryptoex.com


Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@xxxxxxxx
Security-related bug reports go to security@xxxxxxx, not here