[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [suse-security] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
On Saturday 05 June 2004 21:31, Marc Samendinger wrote:
> I still say its a legit bounce.
It would have been a legit bounce if it was send from my box. See the
following lines from the first message in this thread (go back to this
message to see all headers):
Received: from suse.de (pD951F606.dip.t-dialin.net [220.127.116.11])
by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B95668F3BE
for <25866@xxxxxxx>; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:13:32 +0200 (CEST)
As I have already indicated countless times before and which is shown again
here, the message was not sent from this annoying t-dialin.net customer. The
real sender was a 't-dialin.net' customer who spoofed the sender address
'suse-security@xxxxxxxxxxxx'. You totally missed my point that bouncing
messages based on virus/spam content is wrong for the above mentioned reason
(you'd be creating a new spam problem in the process).
> I'm awaiting your answer and wonder if you will prove me wrong.
As I was on holiday, the reply was late. Yet, if you still don't get it, I'm
wasting my time anyway.
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@xxxxxxxx
Security-related bug reports go to security@xxxxxxx, not here