[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [suse-security] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On Saturday 05 June 2004 21:31, Marc Samendinger wrote:
> I still say its a legit bounce.

It would have been a legit bounce if it was send from my box. See the 
following lines from the first message in this thread (go back to this 
message to see all headers):

Received: from suse.de (pD951F606.dip.t-dialin.net [])
        by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B95668F3BE
        for <25866@xxxxxxx>; Fri,  4 Jun 2004 10:13:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: suse-security@xxxxxxxxxxxx

As I have already indicated countless times before and which is shown again 
here, the message was not sent from this annoying t-dialin.net customer. The 
real sender was a 't-dialin.net' customer who spoofed the sender address 
'suse-security@xxxxxxxxxxxx'. You totally missed my point that bouncing 
messages based on virus/spam content is wrong for the above mentioned reason 
(you'd be creating a new spam problem in the process).

> I'm awaiting your answer and wonder if you will prove me wrong.

As I was on holiday, the reply was late. Yet, if you still don't get it, I'm 
wasting my time anyway.


Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@xxxxxxxx
Security-related bug reports go to security@xxxxxxx, not here