OpenPGP Archiv April 2002

• Date Index

• OpenPGP public key packet format, john . dlugosz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OpenPGP public key packet format, Hal Finney
  • Re: OpenPGP public key packet format, john . dlugosz
• Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Marc Mutz
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • RE: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Leon Kuunders
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Simon Josefsson
    • Re[2]: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Clinton E. Troutman
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Magnus von Koeller
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Keith Moore
    • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, ned . freed
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Marc Mutz
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Keith Moore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Marc Mutz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, john . dlugosz
    • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Jon Callas
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Graham Klyne
    • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Paul Shields
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Derek Atkins
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Paul Shields
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Thomas Roessler
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Sam Roberts
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, john . dlugosz
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, john . dlugosz
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Volker Augustin
    • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Keith Moore
      • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Volker Augustin
  • Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Peter Gutmann
• re: forwarding an encrypted message, vedaal
  • Re: forwarding an encrypted message, Matthew Byng-Maddick
    • Re: forwarding an encrypted message, Ben Laurie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • re: forwarding an encrypted message, john . dlugosz
    • Re: forwarding an encrypted message, vedaal
    • Re: forwarding an encrypted message, David Shaw
  • Re: forwarding an encrypted message, john . dlugosz
• Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Hal Finney
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, vedaal
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, Jon Callas
    • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, David P. Kemp
      • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, Jon Callas
      • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, David P. Kemp
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Hal Finney
    • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Adam Back
    • non-transferable sigs with hashes and encryption only (Re: Recipient-verifiable messages), Adam Back
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Hal Finney
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Hal Finney
    • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGPmessage is useless, Werner Koch
• Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP messageis useless, john . dlugosz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP messageis useless, john . dlugosz
• quasi-deniable signing, John Kane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: quasi-deniable signing, Hal Finney
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• bis04, Werner Koch
  • Re: bis04, Jon Callas
    • Re: bis04, Thomas Roessler
      • Re: bis04, vedaal
      • Re: bis04, Thomas Roessler
      • Re: bis04, Paul Holman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: bis04, john . dlugosz
    • Re: bis04, Jon Callas
  • Re: bis04, john . dlugosz
    • Re: bis04, David Shaw
• Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, john . dlugosz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, Hal Finney
  • Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, john . dlugosz
• Clearsigning considered harmful., Thomas Roessler
• Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Jon Callas
  • Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Thomas Roessler
    • Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Jon Callas
      • Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Thomas Roessler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., john . dlugosz
    • Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Marc Mutz
  • Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., john . dlugosz
• literal data packet tags - nit, Thomas Roessler
  • Re: literal data packet tags - nit, Jon Callas
• bis04: Armor headers w/ non-us-ascii values, Marc Mutz
  • Re: bis04: Armor headers w/ non-us-ascii values, Thomas Roessler
• sha-1 protected test key, Werner Koch
  • Re: sha-1 protected test key, Imad R. Faiad
    • Re: sha-1 protected test key, Timo Schulz
• What's left before a new RFC?, Jon Callas
  • Revocation target subpacket (Re: What's left before a new RFC?), Michael Young
    • Re: Revocation target subpacket (Re: What's left before a new RFC?), David Shaw
    • Re: Revocation target subpacket (Re: What's left before a newRFC?), Jon Callas
  • Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Marcel Waldvogel
    • Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Marc Mutz
      • Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Marcel Waldvogel
      • Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Marc Mutz
  • Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Florian Weimer
    • Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Jon Callas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What's left before a new RFC?, john . dlugosz
  • Re: What's left before a new RFC?, john . dlugosz
• bis04: revocation key nits, David Shaw
  • Re: bis04: revocation key nits, Jon Callas
    • Re: bis04: revocation key nits, David Shaw
• Whither comment packets?, David Shaw
  • Re: Whither comment packets?, Jon Callas
    • Re: Whither comment packets?, Werner Koch
      • Re: Whither comment packets?, Adam Back
• Re: non-transferable sigs with hashes and encryption only (Re: Recipient-verifiable messages), Hal Finney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: non-transferable sigs with hashes and encryption only (Re: Recipient-verifiable messages), Dominikus Scherkl
• New Draft Gone Out, Jon Callas
• Notary signatures, David Shaw
  • Re: Notary signatures, Len Sassaman
  • Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas
    • Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw
      • Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas
      • Re: Notary signatures, Len Sassaman
      • Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas
      • Re: Notary signatures, Derek Atkins
      • Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw
      • Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas
      • Re: Notary signatures, Len Sassaman
      • Re: Notary signatures, Werner Koch
      • Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw
      • Re: Notary signatures, Derek Atkins
      • Re: Notary signatures, Bill Frantz
      • Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas
      • Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw
      • Timestamp Signatures (was Re: Notary signatures), Jon Callas
      • Re: Timestamp Signatures (was Re: Notary signatures), David Shaw
      • Re: Timestamp Signatures (was Re: Notary signatures), Jon Callas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Notary signatures, Hal Finney
    • Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas
    • Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw
  • Re: Notary signatures, Hal Finney
• Musings on Notary signatures, john . dlugosz
  • Re: Musings on Notary signatures, vedaal
    • Re: Musings on Notary signatures, Jon Callas
      • Re: Musings on Notary signatures, vedaal
  • Re: Musings on Notary signatures, David Shaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Musings on Notary signatures, john . dlugosz
    • Re: Musings on Notary signatures, David Shaw
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• bis05: Armor Headers, Marc Mutz
  • Re: bis05: Armor Headers, Werner Koch
  • Re: bis05: Armor Headers, David Shaw