[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [suse-security] Old question: what is SUSE going to do with harden_suse / Bastille
* Bo Jacobsen wrote on Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 16:19 +0200:
> > an interface -- remember W32/Blaster? Each time I set up a
> > SuSE, I get angry about that idiocy.
I don't think that I tell you anything new or surprising when
telling major Linux-Distries become more and more similar to the
WinWorld in many points, including too fast feature
implementation and increasing security problems. SuSE is not an
exception, but it's a company and sell what most people desire;
that is a XP look-a-like (KDE) with auto-install. Today you'll
find on SuSE's online store price information for licensing by 5
or 10 users or by 2 or 4 CPUs. But the customers seem to want
that this way so SuSE delivers.
> I agree 100%. They need an install option named firewall, or
> some thing like that, that leaves out ANY stuff that should not
> run on a firewall. I actually find it a little strange that
> they have not implemented that a long time ago, since security
> has been a hot topic for a long time now.
They do have:
You can also get a Training, maybe you can even get a SCSE (SuSE
Certified Security Engeneer) or something.
Dieses Schreiben wurde maschinell erstellt,
es trägt daher weder Unterschrift noch Siegel.
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@xxxxxxxx
Security-related bug reports go to security@xxxxxxx, not here